Consistently demonstrates the capacity, aspiration, and enterprise impact for significantly broader executive scope.
FY27 · TALENT REVIEW PRIMER
Make a forward-looking call,
then show your evidence.
This review is about executive potential and readiness for broader scope—not a second performance rating. Use the packet, current work, observed behavior, and calibration to make a provisional judgment you can explain.
Do not force a distribution across a team of four. Assess each person against the definitions and available evidence.
The four placements
Potential, not current performanceShows credible indicators of broader-scope potential, with specific experiences or outcomes still needed to validate it.
Strong contribution in current or adjacent scope; focus on sustained engagement, mastery, and targeted growth.
Potential is emerging or evidence is incomplete; define focused development and observe progress before a broader call.
What you complete in Workday
Six required fields- 01Executive Potential
Select one of the four placements.
- 02Attrition Risk
Use a current, direct signal—not assumption or market stereotype.
- 03Business Impact of Loss
Consider scope, scarce expertise, relationships, and concentration of dependency.
- 04Ready for Next Move
Answer whether the person could move within 12 months into a concrete broader role.
- 05Notes for Placement
State impact, broader-scope evidence, counter-evidence, and your conclusion.
- 06Development Actions
Name up to three observable experiences or outcomes for the next 12 months.
Recommended sequence
No pre-review meetings requiredReview prior placement, performance, current outcomes, and direct collaboration evidence.
Make a provisional call and record evidence both for and against it.
Test consistency, bias, role availability, and whether “Ready” refers to a real next move.
Enter the six fields in Workday after leadership alignment.
Discuss development after alignment; do not promise placement or promotion.
Evidence check
Before you finalize
- Am I separating performance from potential?
- Do I have examples across time, not one visible moment?
- Did I weigh adoption and outcomes, not only activity?
- Would I describe the same behavior consistently across people?
- What evidence would change my recommendation?
Always-on refresh
Revisit the record when scope changes, a material outcome lands, readiness evidence changes, attrition signals emerge, or leadership calibration produces new context. This desk is decision support; Workday remains the system of record.